Hide Ugly Pipes On Bathroom Sinks

That Mess Palazzo Chigi a precedent against the rules

Eugenio Scalfari

There are, in the decree law passed last night by the government, a merit and a number of defects. Ezio Mauro, in his editorial in yesterday has already given an account. Continue on the same street opened by him and the considerations set out by the former President of the Constitutional Court, Valerio Onida. But there is also and above all a political direction that emerges from that decree, which raises great concern.

The value is in giving the majority ruling party and its candidates the opportunity to participate in the regional vote in Lombardy and Lazio, in order to exercise the right to vote and stand. This need was stressed not only by those concerned but also by opposition parties. Bersani, Di Pietro, Casini, had said in recent days to want to win disputing their eventual victory on the field and not at the table. " The Order allows this to happen and in fact will happen if the Administrative Court of Lombardy and Lazio they consider the conditions on the basis of the decree already in place when the two courts will decide. It is for them - and not the decree - whether to the requirements have been properly fulfilled.

defects - which can best be defined as actual abuses - are manifold. Some political, others of a constitutional nature. Let's start with the latter. Is there a law of 1988 which prohibits any decree on elections.

It is now clear that a decree of interpretation (as has been defined as of yesterday) can not be contrary to applicable law and essentially repeal without thereby produce a breakthrough. Cease, therefore, the nature of interpretation that turns out to be only un'appiccicatura mystifying, and reappears but rather an intervention that changes contradict current standards on the same subject.


There is another very sensitive issue: the entire electoral matters concerning the regions is attributable to the region. The same procedure with regard to electoral laws differ in several points on the other one o'clock. It 'so much doubt that the national government can come up with an interpretation of laws that are not entirely attributable to its direct. Interpretations of this kind would be granted to regional councils which have expired, however, pending renewal election.

On all these issues will certainly be brought complaints and questions to the Court. If this makes me wonder what would they uphold the validity and the results of elections March 29. The President rightly called "a mess" the situation created. Unfortunately yesterday the decree does not address the mess indeed in many ways makes it worse.

As for the political incorrectness, the most serious concerns the non-sharing of the amnesty decreed by the government with the opposition forces. The President had repeatedly stressed the desirability and indeed had become conditioned to it every declaration. His rejection of yesterday to authorize a decree that would change the election procedures for election in progress was also motivated by this.

not only sharing but is not the prime minister and his colleagues without exception have blamed the opposition for having made it impossible to exercise the right election. In this particular responsibility of the opposition would have occurred in Rome, where radical militants and other parties have physically blocked the representatives of the PDL list preventing them from crossing the threshold of the Elections Office of the tribunal.
This circumstance, on which the radicals have already raised the complaint of defamation, it will still be tested before the TAR of Lazio in court tomorrow. It 'still serious so macroscopic reversal of responsibilities, based on which the guilty punished and the innocent are condoned.

*

Speaker of the House, Gianfranco Fini, described the decree of the government as the "lesser evil", once again distinguishing himself with these words from the line of Berlusconi. But in this case fell short Fini. The decree of interpretation is not a lesser evil. And 'bad same or even worse than a decree innovative.

First you can not give a different interpretation, and so extensive to an election process with retroactive effect. The construction, if retroactive, it becomes a real amnesty and amnesty is the most innovative will be the legislative point of view.

But it gets worse. As in a previous public law also applies to produce a variant the future, this precedent can be invoked from now on to condone any procedural irregularities in the government's discretion. It was not enough the system of orders, enforceable and free from constitutional scrutiny budget, it will be added from now on be under the decree by the aberrant interpretive principle that the substance will prevail over form, as he declared a few days ago President of the Senate, Schifani, giving expression to an otherwise blatantly subversive of the principle of legality. Exists in our language the word "sprocedato" to describe a person who behaves incorrectly in a manner contrary to his duties. The one is that right, it means sprocedato precisely "with no steps."

And so, to determine the prevalence of substance over form in procedural matters has no permanent effect that legitimize the illegality in public life, or rather, to coincide with the legality of the will of the Chief Executive, namely to establish the legitimacy of absolutism.

A decree interpretation with retroactive power makes this extremely serious precedent. No coincidence that Berlusconi has repeatedly dangled the threat alleged by the Constitutional Court to raise a conflict of powers between the Government and the Head of State. Gianni Letta was the "missus Dominicus" of this real ultimatum - In what is known - is claimed with unusual decision. These gentlemen of the Pope are giving us many surprises in a few days here on the most varied terrain. A bed in step armor and launched in charge we had not seen it yet but some time under his glove appeared increasingly the iron claw.

lesser evil, Fini? Unfortunately, it seems.

*

What to do? Who is eligible to represent the Tar problems that fall within its jurisdiction with regard to the assessment of implementation of the decree. (The Tar Lombard has already received the suspension order Formigoni Office election and take a final decision in the coming days). Who is eligible for raises issues of constitutionality before the Court.

The exposure "sprocedate" Di Pietro of the President of the Republic are to be rejected without ifs and buts. In the given situation the Head of State was put in need and had to give priority to the exercise of electoral right, be able to pull off some transitional arrangements which restricts the application of the decree only to the regions of Lombardy and Lazio. It would have to be created an inequality among voters before the law causing a constitutional vulnus available evidence. It remains the mess and above that accelerates the transformation of the state from the arbitrary rule of the sovereign. Voters will judge the candidates first and the programs they have incurred. But it will be good to reflect on these political aspects of democratic devolution. It will not be a referendum for or against Berlusconi, but certainly the opportunity to choose in favor of laws that apply to all or in favor of "cliques" that have occupied the institutions using them for their very private interests. The opportunity to change this bad habit will come in twenty days. To err is human, but to persevere in error is not.

Cartier Trinity Ring Price Canada

Sleep Region Produces Monsters

Di Marcello Fois

comment on the current political season in Sardinia means, in many ways, a trip in the dark muddy dell'insipienza. The result of the recent elections, which ousted that overbearing Renato Soru from the helm of a region which was in danger of being lost in the open sea dell'illiberalismo, reported that same region in the quagmire in which it was planned that ran aground.

A year later it is clear that the restoration took place in full: coast building, housing deregulation, immobility, spoils-system savage return welfarism electoral complete disappearance from the landscape of Sardinia national media. The president Silvio Berlusconi a year ago, from the streets of Sardinia, has made commitments and very precise wording of a very short time, a year, to solve those two or three things that the dictator had undone Soru: building on the coast against the illiberal block (the votes of the territories coastal), placing the problems associated with the laxity with which Mr. Tiscali had addressed matters of Porto Vesme and Sulcis Iglesiente (votes suited) immediate resolution through the "friend Vladimir" (Putin) deals and annexations of factories, ravine where the Communist billionaire had not spent enough (more votes); immediate spread happiness and smiles against the shadowy, Presbyterian, Syrian behavior, the ipso facto proof that the Sassari-Olbia was given a well established, so that all he wanted was a phone call to begin the work, the satisfaction of being able to explain to La Maddalena how you could benefit from a G8 run triple from the right rather than from the Stalinist left.

Well a year has passed and a new interior landscape is wide open before the eyes of politicians Sardinians. Those with a straight back into the silence of the Secretariat said that, as the last and least equipped elector of the village, too, although long-time directors, this time there has been deceived, and that, unmark the current turn of events , is becoming an imperative. A right someone understands that the only chance to afford at least a hint of election campaign in Sardinia is to immediately take the distances from the Regional Government in that year, as established in Arcore, was conspicuous by its absence.

left the problem effectively is to cultivate a short memory and try to forget that the active participation of many "progressive" coalition to cross the doctors, bricklayers and courtly, he gave Berlusconi in Sardinia without the right of sbattesse much. However, shortly before the Region, to Berlusconi, was given the flag Quattro Mori, just to sanctify yet another turning point sardisti of looking for a place in the sun. Quell 'image will remain as an icon of Sardinian history and as recently confirmed that there are coalitions, the March on Rome onwards, have made the "flow" style. Tailoring policy begins to claim victims as soon as there is confusion between national and local politics. In fact, those who have their own style and recognizable without ambiguity, as the very interesting movement of the IRS, forward, deservedly, in popular esteem.

Members of the IRS understand that, in this particular contingency, the upcoming local elections in Sardinia have concerns about how far apart are the objectives of the National Government the actual needs of Sardinia today. And recent events prove him right on all fronts. For example, the horrendous wiretaps involving local politicians in the investigation Sardinian procurement G8 designed by Soru, La Maddalena. We understand clearly why the National Premier has so fierce antipathy against interception. They, while not giving anything illegal, indicate something worse: a court of servants silly bully the weak and timid with the powers that be.

This slime widespread reports of backroom deals, agreed to appointment of lobbyes rampant, and, although not always feasible, equalize illegality, because the impotence of the states that we believed to elect representatives freely. A sample media such as the Hon. Berlusconi knows that it is precisely this lack of confidence that you die as a political leader. Certainly Dr. Cappellacci not currently have this same problem: finished its task of lightning, from which it comes back into oblivion as nails (if anyone remembers him, the governor of Abruzzo?).

E 'own Hugh Cappellacci the character more "interesting" in this very sad story, in his huge and clumsy attempt to appear to the administrator of the Sardinian service, rather than Berlusconi. In his having to ask permission agreed not to outsource any of the predecessors to the point that Pili and Soru seem, by comparison, two giants of not only political, but also local pride. Yet we are in a region where, more or less clear, the judges will determine if they are dealing with, we must return at least one winner of Sanremo and who was robbed of the G8, with its consequences in terms of social truce.

had not the G8? Take, Valerio Scanu! Which, among other things, a lake and was promoted by the Regional Councillor for Culture of excellence in the Sardinian sample that relies on a national level. Moreover as to blame Mrs. Baire seen the silence dense Sardinian intellectuals, including some that are really excels. Just think ': domestic suppliers and friends, winners of festivals and brown tissue. Very much in line with cowardly idea of \u200b\u200bSardinia. Soon, in the coastal town continues, we will return to do the unskilled workers, the messengers, the keepers of the night, gardeners, waiters, seasonal, guardians of the villas, yachts in the hubs. Then, finally tamed, will run to wear the costume room to be ready to deliver wreaths of myrtle and sweet almond to tourists at ports and airports. Sleep Region Produces Monsters.

Moving Into A Basement

The health

Tonight to Ales, the meeting of the Democratic Party on the issue of health Sardinia. All these, each with its prospects, ideas, expectations concerning a party a few weeks ago was given an operational structure. All related unequivocally to condemn the perverse logic of a break-up of the current health Sardinian regional government, with the dismantling of the health care plan that after twenty years saw the light in the island, is dangerously implementing. The crux of the debate could be summarized in one sentence of comment that someone has expressed toward the redesign of the same health care system: "better bring twenty patients by a doctor or a doctor for twenty patients?". It 'was a good opportunity to meet, help to the militants, simple exposition of some key issues for non-experts, significant for giving positive signs of vitality after long parenthesis of silence that the pd has lived at all levels in these last years.

Poofy Hot Pink Dresses

The Pd hypocrisy day in Port of Shadows - Giuseppe D'Avanzo

USUALLY discreet, the Rome prosecutor Giovanni Ferrara decided to speak in public. It is already a mistake. It should always speak to the judges of the facts. In the flesh of an inquiry or process, then it is only right that those facts are offered only in places designated for: the audience, the classroom. The arguments that the prosecutor committed worsen the picture. Ferrara can not find the courage and the humility to say at least sorry for what happened in his office and himself. He chose unwisely to the government of the department of crimes against the public administration a toga proved unfaithful, Achille Toro.

Achille Toro, it turns out, soothes, and truncates the investigation - it turns out - even to suspects drafts outcomes that are haunted by the scandal of Civil Protection. A good reason to regret his unhappy in public preference; of the incorruptibility of others reassure prosecutors undertake to understand what and why has not gone wrong, how to change page. Ferrara does not care about that. In Toro, the criticism that his behavior opens his attorney, Ferrara does not seem interested. Took the floor for another amazing work to do: blame the moves of the prosecutor of Florence, demolish the correctness of an investigation that shook the political world and the government reveals the habits combriccolari while hiding behind the "political emergency" .

His argument is evil: those prosecutors were not "competent". Should refrain from making any step because the hypothetical crimes were committed in Rome and the prosecution of the Capital is the sole authority to proceed. It is a radical complaint: that investigation is illegal and perhaps even illegal. Ferrara knows that survived the fall of the dictatorship and confusedly accommodated by the legislature, our code provides "an ideal breeding ground for the ideological conflicts of the operators." There is a place for managing and resolving these disputes is the Court of Cassation. It is the road, raising a public controversy and somewhat artificial even on the merits, Ferrara did not take. He wants a political controversy. Requests it. Press to discredit Florence destroying a politically sensitive work. The sortie of the high magistrate, with his silence on the misdeeds of Achille Toro and the clamor against the other attorney, revives at once the doubt and confusion surrounding a long time the prosecutor in Rome. Office quietist often, sometimes affected by the disease of conformity, almost intimidated by their independence.

That "disease," noted Peter Calamandrei, is nothing but an obsession that does not wait for external recommendations, but prevents, that does not bend to Pressing the power, but if the image is the satisfaction in advance. Often the mechanisms intellectual, emotional atmosphere, the corporate solidarity that can be seen in the office of Ferrara appear affected by the disease and the words seem arrogant to claim that ancient, bizarre, questionable claim - almost caste - Public Prosecutor of Rome to be the criminal court previously established by the Mighty: anywhere offenders, Roma loquitur. As was the case - remember Franco Cordero - ancien régime in France where "they were called Committimus the letters by which people date, avoiding the usual courts, brought an action before a supreme court."

There were therefore, in the morning, have good reason to worry and wonder if it is high time that the Rome prosecutors better cultivate its autonomy and independence from political power, but that happens in the afternoon to make ends grotesque, or "Italian" (you do), the case. Eighty deputies rebel against the move of their head. It convenes a meeting. Toni access, stringent assessments. It asks Ferrara to disprove what he is given or to accept the rebuke of a collective and public notice of its workforce. The result is a press tartufesco, incredibly also signed by Ferrara, where we read that the prosecutor of Florence "there is no clash" because "the professionalism of those colleagues is not at issue," that in Rome there is "distress "for what he has combined Achille Toro, but his infidelity does not stain the robes of others in an office that is cohesive and therefore do not distrust his head.

The note is a masterpiece of hypocrisy, The frail attempt to give an appearance of solidity and coherence fried air that leaves unresolved the sober mistrust that is nourished by the prosecutor in Rome. It is an apprehension that can not be changed in a day or a season. You can at least change the habits of that office immediately and open spaces to the many prosecutors who wish to do only the work that the Constitution assigns to them. It's up to these substitutes beat a blow to dispel the fog that can still be seen around that building. You must have confidence that this will happen soon.


from Repubblica.it