Does Wesley Pipes Have Herpes

Raiperunanotte - when the word is free

until we have a voice and to tell the truth, until we are free to express ourselves, to spread our thoughts so that others may hear. The sense of Raiperunanotte was this. The unequivocal demonstration of the existence of an Italy that think and reason, who is passionate to the facts and merit more than a questionable hetero of a mass media system. The event this evening's claims, no ifs, ands or buts, the right and freedom of press and expression, the sacred need to know first. Tonight I could feel once again to the left, strongly clearly, as I was going for a long, long time, confused and often anesthetized faded from insipid speeches of pseudo-leader of the party, I could write again, and so insapettata, a sense of my "stay left", being the side of freedom of expression at all costs, by being part of the culture and unrestrained dispassionate, to being part of the inalienable values \u200b\u200bsuch as community spirit, legality, ethics and politics. To this I say, maybe a bit sin 'of naive fans, thanks Santoro, Travaglio thanks, and thanks to those who have watched this evening Raiperunanotte.

Fake Birth Certificates Australian

Nuclear, Another Thin Sardinian

ORISTANO. Right now they are clues. Clues that, once again, lead in Sardinia. The deputy of the PDL, George Stracquadanio, it was very clear: the island is the ideal location for a nuclear plant.
During the Omnibus television program, La 7, during a debate on regional elections, Stracquadanio intervened to justify the "no" to nuclear power plants to regions such as Lombardy, Veneto and Piedmont, "are areas of high consumption Energy - said the Parliamentary Assembly of the PDL - and then, if in spite of this produce with the current system so as to be self-sufficient, is perhaps not appropriate to place the plants there. Also because then you have to distribute the energy produced and lost during deployment. "
So no to nuclear power in Lombardy, Veneto and Piedmont regions self-sufficient because even with a large energy.
and Sardinia? "My friend Cappellacci - said in its reasoning, the Parliamentary Assembly of the PDL - says he has some misgivings. But it is a general statement. In Sardinia we had a problem recently. There was the crisis of Alcoa, an industry vital to the island. The Government is negotiating with great determination to keep jobs. But the production of the aluminum industry that works requires a high consumption of energy. So if we can get the nearby energy production is better. In most plants also need large amounts of water, so the ideal would be to put the center nearby. "
Not a word about the fact that the remaining power (unless the plant is not for the exclusive use of Alcoa) should still be carried, and with far greater problems than those encountered in Lombardy, Veneto and Piemonte.
Mr Stracquadanio then toned down: "We think with all the peoples and regions, the definition of a strategic choice that the majority did gain the support of voters."
long circulating a list, released by the Greens, which states that areas identified for reactors, as well as with the Oristano plain Cirras, would be: Monfalcone (Friuli Venezia Giulia), Chioggia (Venezia), Caorso (Emilia Romagna ), was and Trino (Piedmont), Scarborough (Tuscany), San Benedetto del Tronto (Marche), Montalto di Castro and Latina (Lazio), Termoli (Molise), Mola di Bari (Puglia) or site of Nardo and Manduria, Scanzano ion (Basilicata), Palma (Sicily). The Government has so far said that the sites have not yet been identified.

La Nuova Sardegna

Do You Wear Tighty Whities Around House?

Raiperunanotte

RAI PERUNANOTTE

THURSDAY ' March 25, 21.00

How To Secure A Mirror On A Mantle

McCarthy Worse than sixty years ago

of Eugenio Scalfari

to omit the usual hour and querulous lamentations of our national pseudo St. Sebastian pierced with arrows of communist magistrates. It seems to me more interesting to start this article with a remark on the common sense of the centrists.
The centrists, those who do not like to take a position, even at times when taking sides is inevitable, take refuge in the technique to get the ball in the stands rather than keep it on the field. The arguments used and now practices are: to describe the manifestations of such tired rituals people lived with bored indifference even to those who take part, stressed that "real issues" are not those of deployment but the programs of the regions in which they will vote March 28 and finally to stress the importance of mass abstention from the vote as a signal suitable to lead the political class on course administration.

This centrist wisdom does not seem to grasp the reality with regard to the facts and it seems to me quite reckless in its proposals. The square of the People yesterday afternoon was packed and seething passion, sense of responsibility and set of furious indignation nothing to do with the indifference a rite tired. The proposal addressed to the center of the abstention shows the rope: the abstention would only be a favor to us sgoverna majority and the government does not at all on the right path of good administration.

The government would be happy to abstention on the left to offset the large abstention that is visible on the right. If it is true - and even the centrists say it now quite clearly - that the government can not express a policy in place but puts all the legal and illicit means to shore up his power by canceling checks and guarantees, the instrument of choice is the only one capable of punishing him that if they register or change go. The voters of the right in good faith to refrain turarsi instead of the nose to smell that bad now perceive themselves, and those left will vote without hesitation because it is the only way to come to your senses and lay stunned a country that makes the crack man Low institutions.

The real problems, unemployment, loss of income, immigration, health care, the South, are many and serious, but the problem is precisely the problem and the clique of the gang boss. If not resolved prior to, all others will continue to rot.
We have yet another confirmation of the latest news coming from the prosecutor of Trani, which are all over the papers yesterday. The Prime Minister claimed that the Authority guarantor of pluralism in the media "zero transmission Annozero, repeatedly gave indications of how to conduct Minzolini Tg1, has imposed on the Director General of RAI to block unwanted transmissions.
is possible that these behaviors do not constitute serious crimes, but it certainly tells a policy of oppression against indecent pluralism and press freedom. For a party leader and especially for the prime minister and head of the executive, these repeated interventions should take immediate and irrevocable resignation. It should be the first to claim against its employees, including co-founder of the PDL, Gianfranco Fini.
* * *


The constitutional concept of Silvio Berlusconi is very clear: he wants to rewrite the Constitution. Not to modify some points, but rewrite it distorting the spirit, making the summit a "conducator" directly elected by the people with the parliamentary majority he himself is subject to its stated desire not only the executive and the legislative as well as the magistrates of the public Ministry, the Constitutional Court and the authority to control and assurance.
This project is not born but is now in his mind since 2001, when the term began that lasted until 2006 and took place during the seven of Carlo Azeglio Ciampi at the Quirinale. The differences between the president and the prime minister were numerous, especially that theme had as its object, not being able to change the Constitution in the manner he desired Berlusconi tried to change it in fact systematically challenging the powers of head of state and the powers that derived.
The head of state is the crowning institution of parliamentary democracy as well as set up our Constitution and, for that the major obstacle to the projects of Berlusconi. It is therefore no coincidence that its targets were constant Scalfaro, Ciampi, Napolitano, three men very different, with different characters and different cultural origins, but with the same dedication to their constitutional duties. And why all three were targeted by Berlusconi since he ascended to the presidency for the first time the Council had in mind to govern alone, without any obstacles whatsoever to review the legality of his actions and limit the discretion that He wants full and complete.

The friction with Ciampi were, as I mentioned, numerous. Two of them in particular took place in circumstances of extreme tension. The first occasion of the appointment of three judges of the Constitutional Court, the second at the time of the promulgation of the Gasparri law on the national television system.
I had the good fortune to Ciampi to be bound by a friendship that has lasted forty years, so he had a long tale of those two episodes shortly after they took place. I have never revealed the story, which I have kept the notes in my journal daily. I hope that President Ciampi will forgive me if I mention it now because I have so far complied with the confidentiality that has no more raison d'etre to the point where came the Italian political situation.

The episode concerning the appointment of three judges of the Check in the amount that the Constitution reserves to the President of the Republic, took place in the hall of patio del Quirinale. Also present were Secretary General of the Quirinale, Gifuni and Secretary to the Prime Minister Gianni Letta. The topics for discussion were two: the relationship with the European Commission in Brussels, where the prime minister had to go to solve some important problems and the appointment of three judges.
Spent the first argument Ciampi took out a folder from the three measures for the appointment and he informed Berlusconi names chosen by him. Berlusconi objected that he wanted to think about it and asked for time to reflect and make a list of alternative names. Ciampi said that the choice in terms of the Constitution, was attributable to its exclusive and that the signature of the Prime Minister was due to an act that served only by a notary public to certify that the signature of the Head of State was authentic and occurred in his presence. That said, without further ado Ciampi took the pen and signed through the three documents to Berlusconi for the counter.
At that point the prime minister got angry tone and said he would never have signed not because he dislikes the names of the judges but because no one could force him to submit to a choice that did not come from him, the sole source of sovereignty, since they derive from sovereign people.
Ciampi's response was cold: "The documents will be sent to you in an hour at Palazzo Chigi. I've signed in your presence and in the presence of two qualified witnesses. If you do not regain my back immediately countersigned by you will be forced to raise a jurisdictional dispute before the Constitutional Court. "Hail" Berlusconi said as coldly and left the patio followed by letters. In the evening, the three went back to Ciampi acts of appointment duly countersigned.

The second episode occurred during a breakfast at the Quirinale, always in the presence of Gifuni and letters. The House voted by the Gasparri law and had forwarded to Ciampi to sign promulgation. Presented, in the eyes of the Head of State, various and serious grounds of unconstitutionality and mortified that pluralism is an essential requirement in a democracy, and on which, just a few months ago, Ciampi sent his message to Parliament.
The breakfast had just started when Ciampi informed his guest of his intention to refer the bills to Parliament as the Constitution authorizes it to do with the reasons for the postponement and the points of law to be amended. Berlusconi did not wait for that court. He rose with a rush and raised his voice saying that this was a real stab in the back. Ciampi (so his story) he sat still eat, but repeated that he would have referred the law to Parliament. Another shouted that the law would still have been approved as such and returned to the Quirinal and added: "Do you realize that you're hurting and Mediaset Mediaset is one thing I? You're hurting my thing." At that point
Ciampi also stood up and said: "What you just said is very serious.'re confessing that Mediaset is your thing, that you're pointing out to me a blatant conflict of interest. If I had a question to postpone the law, now I have even the obligation. " "Then it will be war between us and you that you have desired. Do not set foot in this building."

went out with his faithful Letta. Ciampi returned the law. Prime Minister for six months did not set foot in the Quirinale.
Last Friday I saw on Sky is a beautiful movie produced by George Clooney. It's called "Good Night and Good Luck," Good night and good luck, and tells of a broadcasting company Democrats who led the protest against the American campaign of intimidation by which Senator McCarthy, chairman of a committee of inquiry of the Senate, was struck and intimidated journalists, academics, producers and actors, businessmen, trade unionists, scientists and the class leader accused of being Communists or their supporters. That
television company, led by a courageous journalist, McCarthy put on trial, he documented the bias and caused such a movement of public opinion that the Senate opened an investigation and McCarthy deposed from all his positions.
Sky has put on air the other day and made a good choice in my opinion: the its relevance is amazing.
I will quote the words with which the protagonist concludes: "Television is a tool that can and should help make people more aware, more responsible and free. If these conditions are missing these targets and television is only a box full of electric wires and tubes. "
I added a box, but sometimes very dangerous if someone take it by force and to monitor their own use.
Good Night, and Good Luck.

Hide Ugly Pipes On Bathroom Sinks

That Mess Palazzo Chigi a precedent against the rules

Eugenio Scalfari

There are, in the decree law passed last night by the government, a merit and a number of defects. Ezio Mauro, in his editorial in yesterday has already given an account. Continue on the same street opened by him and the considerations set out by the former President of the Constitutional Court, Valerio Onida. But there is also and above all a political direction that emerges from that decree, which raises great concern.

The value is in giving the majority ruling party and its candidates the opportunity to participate in the regional vote in Lombardy and Lazio, in order to exercise the right to vote and stand. This need was stressed not only by those concerned but also by opposition parties. Bersani, Di Pietro, Casini, had said in recent days to want to win disputing their eventual victory on the field and not at the table. " The Order allows this to happen and in fact will happen if the Administrative Court of Lombardy and Lazio they consider the conditions on the basis of the decree already in place when the two courts will decide. It is for them - and not the decree - whether to the requirements have been properly fulfilled.

defects - which can best be defined as actual abuses - are manifold. Some political, others of a constitutional nature. Let's start with the latter. Is there a law of 1988 which prohibits any decree on elections.

It is now clear that a decree of interpretation (as has been defined as of yesterday) can not be contrary to applicable law and essentially repeal without thereby produce a breakthrough. Cease, therefore, the nature of interpretation that turns out to be only un'appiccicatura mystifying, and reappears but rather an intervention that changes contradict current standards on the same subject.


There is another very sensitive issue: the entire electoral matters concerning the regions is attributable to the region. The same procedure with regard to electoral laws differ in several points on the other one o'clock. It 'so much doubt that the national government can come up with an interpretation of laws that are not entirely attributable to its direct. Interpretations of this kind would be granted to regional councils which have expired, however, pending renewal election.

On all these issues will certainly be brought complaints and questions to the Court. If this makes me wonder what would they uphold the validity and the results of elections March 29. The President rightly called "a mess" the situation created. Unfortunately yesterday the decree does not address the mess indeed in many ways makes it worse.

As for the political incorrectness, the most serious concerns the non-sharing of the amnesty decreed by the government with the opposition forces. The President had repeatedly stressed the desirability and indeed had become conditioned to it every declaration. His rejection of yesterday to authorize a decree that would change the election procedures for election in progress was also motivated by this.

not only sharing but is not the prime minister and his colleagues without exception have blamed the opposition for having made it impossible to exercise the right election. In this particular responsibility of the opposition would have occurred in Rome, where radical militants and other parties have physically blocked the representatives of the PDL list preventing them from crossing the threshold of the Elections Office of the tribunal.
This circumstance, on which the radicals have already raised the complaint of defamation, it will still be tested before the TAR of Lazio in court tomorrow. It 'still serious so macroscopic reversal of responsibilities, based on which the guilty punished and the innocent are condoned.

*

Speaker of the House, Gianfranco Fini, described the decree of the government as the "lesser evil", once again distinguishing himself with these words from the line of Berlusconi. But in this case fell short Fini. The decree of interpretation is not a lesser evil. And 'bad same or even worse than a decree innovative.

First you can not give a different interpretation, and so extensive to an election process with retroactive effect. The construction, if retroactive, it becomes a real amnesty and amnesty is the most innovative will be the legislative point of view.

But it gets worse. As in a previous public law also applies to produce a variant the future, this precedent can be invoked from now on to condone any procedural irregularities in the government's discretion. It was not enough the system of orders, enforceable and free from constitutional scrutiny budget, it will be added from now on be under the decree by the aberrant interpretive principle that the substance will prevail over form, as he declared a few days ago President of the Senate, Schifani, giving expression to an otherwise blatantly subversive of the principle of legality. Exists in our language the word "sprocedato" to describe a person who behaves incorrectly in a manner contrary to his duties. The one is that right, it means sprocedato precisely "with no steps."

And so, to determine the prevalence of substance over form in procedural matters has no permanent effect that legitimize the illegality in public life, or rather, to coincide with the legality of the will of the Chief Executive, namely to establish the legitimacy of absolutism.

A decree interpretation with retroactive power makes this extremely serious precedent. No coincidence that Berlusconi has repeatedly dangled the threat alleged by the Constitutional Court to raise a conflict of powers between the Government and the Head of State. Gianni Letta was the "missus Dominicus" of this real ultimatum - In what is known - is claimed with unusual decision. These gentlemen of the Pope are giving us many surprises in a few days here on the most varied terrain. A bed in step armor and launched in charge we had not seen it yet but some time under his glove appeared increasingly the iron claw.

lesser evil, Fini? Unfortunately, it seems.

*

What to do? Who is eligible to represent the Tar problems that fall within its jurisdiction with regard to the assessment of implementation of the decree. (The Tar Lombard has already received the suspension order Formigoni Office election and take a final decision in the coming days). Who is eligible for raises issues of constitutionality before the Court.

The exposure "sprocedate" Di Pietro of the President of the Republic are to be rejected without ifs and buts. In the given situation the Head of State was put in need and had to give priority to the exercise of electoral right, be able to pull off some transitional arrangements which restricts the application of the decree only to the regions of Lombardy and Lazio. It would have to be created an inequality among voters before the law causing a constitutional vulnus available evidence. It remains the mess and above that accelerates the transformation of the state from the arbitrary rule of the sovereign. Voters will judge the candidates first and the programs they have incurred. But it will be good to reflect on these political aspects of democratic devolution. It will not be a referendum for or against Berlusconi, but certainly the opportunity to choose in favor of laws that apply to all or in favor of "cliques" that have occupied the institutions using them for their very private interests. The opportunity to change this bad habit will come in twenty days. To err is human, but to persevere in error is not.

Cartier Trinity Ring Price Canada

Sleep Region Produces Monsters

Di Marcello Fois

comment on the current political season in Sardinia means, in many ways, a trip in the dark muddy dell'insipienza. The result of the recent elections, which ousted that overbearing Renato Soru from the helm of a region which was in danger of being lost in the open sea dell'illiberalismo, reported that same region in the quagmire in which it was planned that ran aground.

A year later it is clear that the restoration took place in full: coast building, housing deregulation, immobility, spoils-system savage return welfarism electoral complete disappearance from the landscape of Sardinia national media. The president Silvio Berlusconi a year ago, from the streets of Sardinia, has made commitments and very precise wording of a very short time, a year, to solve those two or three things that the dictator had undone Soru: building on the coast against the illiberal block (the votes of the territories coastal), placing the problems associated with the laxity with which Mr. Tiscali had addressed matters of Porto Vesme and Sulcis Iglesiente (votes suited) immediate resolution through the "friend Vladimir" (Putin) deals and annexations of factories, ravine where the Communist billionaire had not spent enough (more votes); immediate spread happiness and smiles against the shadowy, Presbyterian, Syrian behavior, the ipso facto proof that the Sassari-Olbia was given a well established, so that all he wanted was a phone call to begin the work, the satisfaction of being able to explain to La Maddalena how you could benefit from a G8 run triple from the right rather than from the Stalinist left.

Well a year has passed and a new interior landscape is wide open before the eyes of politicians Sardinians. Those with a straight back into the silence of the Secretariat said that, as the last and least equipped elector of the village, too, although long-time directors, this time there has been deceived, and that, unmark the current turn of events , is becoming an imperative. A right someone understands that the only chance to afford at least a hint of election campaign in Sardinia is to immediately take the distances from the Regional Government in that year, as established in Arcore, was conspicuous by its absence.

left the problem effectively is to cultivate a short memory and try to forget that the active participation of many "progressive" coalition to cross the doctors, bricklayers and courtly, he gave Berlusconi in Sardinia without the right of sbattesse much. However, shortly before the Region, to Berlusconi, was given the flag Quattro Mori, just to sanctify yet another turning point sardisti of looking for a place in the sun. Quell 'image will remain as an icon of Sardinian history and as recently confirmed that there are coalitions, the March on Rome onwards, have made the "flow" style. Tailoring policy begins to claim victims as soon as there is confusion between national and local politics. In fact, those who have their own style and recognizable without ambiguity, as the very interesting movement of the IRS, forward, deservedly, in popular esteem.

Members of the IRS understand that, in this particular contingency, the upcoming local elections in Sardinia have concerns about how far apart are the objectives of the National Government the actual needs of Sardinia today. And recent events prove him right on all fronts. For example, the horrendous wiretaps involving local politicians in the investigation Sardinian procurement G8 designed by Soru, La Maddalena. We understand clearly why the National Premier has so fierce antipathy against interception. They, while not giving anything illegal, indicate something worse: a court of servants silly bully the weak and timid with the powers that be.

This slime widespread reports of backroom deals, agreed to appointment of lobbyes rampant, and, although not always feasible, equalize illegality, because the impotence of the states that we believed to elect representatives freely. A sample media such as the Hon. Berlusconi knows that it is precisely this lack of confidence that you die as a political leader. Certainly Dr. Cappellacci not currently have this same problem: finished its task of lightning, from which it comes back into oblivion as nails (if anyone remembers him, the governor of Abruzzo?).

E 'own Hugh Cappellacci the character more "interesting" in this very sad story, in his huge and clumsy attempt to appear to the administrator of the Sardinian service, rather than Berlusconi. In his having to ask permission agreed not to outsource any of the predecessors to the point that Pili and Soru seem, by comparison, two giants of not only political, but also local pride. Yet we are in a region where, more or less clear, the judges will determine if they are dealing with, we must return at least one winner of Sanremo and who was robbed of the G8, with its consequences in terms of social truce.

had not the G8? Take, Valerio Scanu! Which, among other things, a lake and was promoted by the Regional Councillor for Culture of excellence in the Sardinian sample that relies on a national level. Moreover as to blame Mrs. Baire seen the silence dense Sardinian intellectuals, including some that are really excels. Just think ': domestic suppliers and friends, winners of festivals and brown tissue. Very much in line with cowardly idea of \u200b\u200bSardinia. Soon, in the coastal town continues, we will return to do the unskilled workers, the messengers, the keepers of the night, gardeners, waiters, seasonal, guardians of the villas, yachts in the hubs. Then, finally tamed, will run to wear the costume room to be ready to deliver wreaths of myrtle and sweet almond to tourists at ports and airports. Sleep Region Produces Monsters.