ORISTANO. Right now they are clues. Clues that, once again, lead in Sardinia. The deputy of the PDL, George Stracquadanio, it was very clear: the island is the ideal location for a nuclear plant.
During the Omnibus television program, La 7, during a debate on regional elections, Stracquadanio intervened to justify the "no" to nuclear power plants to regions such as Lombardy, Veneto and Piedmont, "are areas of high consumption Energy - said the Parliamentary Assembly of the PDL - and then, if in spite of this produce with the current system so as to be self-sufficient, is perhaps not appropriate to place the plants there. Also because then you have to distribute the energy produced and lost during deployment. "
So no to nuclear power in Lombardy, Veneto and Piedmont regions self-sufficient because even with a large energy.
and Sardinia? "My friend Cappellacci - said in its reasoning, the Parliamentary Assembly of the PDL - says he has some misgivings. But it is a general statement. In Sardinia we had a problem recently. There was the crisis of Alcoa, an industry vital to the island. The Government is negotiating with great determination to keep jobs. But the production of the aluminum industry that works requires a high consumption of energy. So if we can get the nearby energy production is better. In most plants also need large amounts of water, so the ideal would be to put the center nearby. "
Not a word about the fact that the remaining power (unless the plant is not for the exclusive use of Alcoa) should still be carried, and with far greater problems than those encountered in Lombardy, Veneto and Piemonte.
Mr Stracquadanio then toned down: "We think with all the peoples and regions, the definition of a strategic choice that the majority did gain the support of voters."
long circulating a list, released by the Greens, which states that areas identified for reactors, as well as with the Oristano plain Cirras, would be: Monfalcone (Friuli Venezia Giulia), Chioggia (Venezia), Caorso (Emilia Romagna ), was and Trino (Piedmont), Scarborough (Tuscany), San Benedetto del Tronto (Marche), Montalto di Castro and Latina (Lazio), Termoli (Molise), Mola di Bari (Puglia) or site of Nardo and Manduria, Scanzano ion (Basilicata), Palma (Sicily). The Government has so far said that the sites have not yet been identified.
During the Omnibus television program, La 7, during a debate on regional elections, Stracquadanio intervened to justify the "no" to nuclear power plants to regions such as Lombardy, Veneto and Piedmont, "are areas of high consumption Energy - said the Parliamentary Assembly of the PDL - and then, if in spite of this produce with the current system so as to be self-sufficient, is perhaps not appropriate to place the plants there. Also because then you have to distribute the energy produced and lost during deployment. "
So no to nuclear power in Lombardy, Veneto and Piedmont regions self-sufficient because even with a large energy.
and Sardinia? "My friend Cappellacci - said in its reasoning, the Parliamentary Assembly of the PDL - says he has some misgivings. But it is a general statement. In Sardinia we had a problem recently. There was the crisis of Alcoa, an industry vital to the island. The Government is negotiating with great determination to keep jobs. But the production of the aluminum industry that works requires a high consumption of energy. So if we can get the nearby energy production is better. In most plants also need large amounts of water, so the ideal would be to put the center nearby. "
Not a word about the fact that the remaining power (unless the plant is not for the exclusive use of Alcoa) should still be carried, and with far greater problems than those encountered in Lombardy, Veneto and Piemonte.
Mr Stracquadanio then toned down: "We think with all the peoples and regions, the definition of a strategic choice that the majority did gain the support of voters."
long circulating a list, released by the Greens, which states that areas identified for reactors, as well as with the Oristano plain Cirras, would be: Monfalcone (Friuli Venezia Giulia), Chioggia (Venezia), Caorso (Emilia Romagna ), was and Trino (Piedmont), Scarborough (Tuscany), San Benedetto del Tronto (Marche), Montalto di Castro and Latina (Lazio), Termoli (Molise), Mola di Bari (Puglia) or site of Nardo and Manduria, Scanzano ion (Basilicata), Palma (Sicily). The Government has so far said that the sites have not yet been identified.
La Nuova Sardegna
0 comments:
Post a Comment